The work environment is no exception. Keeping the place organized and well hygienic, as well as helping with health, also makes the environment more pleasant, thus improving the performance in the work hours. From Molino Stewart this is the best option available.
This health organization comparison is very important for people to definitely learn to organize and take care of the environment in which they live. Making them aware of the damage caused by a simple lack of whim can solve many breathing problems and especially help mothers with the teenage nightmare of tidying up their rooms.
Surely you have seen someone go through this situation:
After a period of heavy pressure and work, the person became ill and needed to get a few days of the medical certificate. Stress and other discomforts are major threats to well-being at work and may compromise the health of the employee and the organization.
Alongside wages, benefits and growth opportunities, the work environment can be a key factor in workers’ decision making. Physical factors of site architecture, as well as harmful traces of organizational culture, can greatly influence the daily life of the company.
Companies that do not value and invest in their employees are jeopardizing their own success. In contrast, organizations that invest in the well-being, physical and mental health and satisfaction of their employees have a catalyst for positive results.
Influence on decision making
A recruitment agency online survey showed that 42% of respondents have already changed jobs because of an overly stressful work environment. The same study revealed that stress at work caused illness in 61% of respondents.
For these reasons, large corporations have increasingly invested in their work environments. Giants such as Google, a corporate wellness benchmark, have been looking for new solutions to improve employee quality of life during office hours.
Top Issues in the Desktop
The internal architecture of companies has changed a lot in the last decades. In the 1960s, it was common for officers to be all divided into rooms, and each professional worked in his own space. This model allowed for more privacy but also limited interactions between team members. About three decades later, companies came to prefer open environments. Low partitions and large lofts without walls provided great interaction between workers, increasing synergy. More recently, however, new research has begun to discuss the effectiveness of this model of internal space organization.
In 2005, two researchers from the University of Sydney, Australia, conducted a large study of the internal architecture of commercial buildings. What the research concluded was that environments with greater isolation cause greater satisfaction among employees. The main complaint related to open environments was related to the lack of sound privacy or the fact that everyone listens to all conversations all the time.
Survey participants recognized greater ease of interaction in open environments. But that, for them, does not compensate for the stress caused by this kind of environment. Despite having a high impact on employee productivity, a building’s internal architecture is not simple to transform. But there are other aspects that impact well-being at work and can be improved.
A highly stressful work environment can lead to health problems and errors in performing tasks. These problems get worse if employees feel pressured by competition to skip vacations or work sick.